Could somebody write your impression over x22

[hatethesystem]

Iam not really convinced of that x22 is vac proof ? could somebody
write to this i only intend to play on vac2 servers and iam not sure x22 modificate the memory so how does Vac 2 doesnt see this "modification"
and are there any test versions of x22?
for god´s sake be patient i am new :)

[munichfame]

i think, no one would pay for a cheat who isn vac ud, and there are soon 3000 users on this forum, so that mast be impression enough!

[Blade]

Have a look in the testimonial section of the forum. This is the place were people post their opinion about the hack. I do not think that a lot of people would purchase x22 hack if it was not VAC proof. I mean he has so many members, and customers here. Most of them are for CSS, and the Call of Duty series. ;)

Now if the hack was detected, or not clean in the log files, or screen shots; then x22 would be losing customers, and a bad word would be going around. Instead, x22 is getting more and more customers, from his hard work, and keep the hacks undetected. :D

[hatethesystem]

better question why x22 and not ********?
and where is the testimonial section of the forum i think i couldnt see it with my status :/

[Blade]

******** hack was detected, and a lot of people came from ********, and got x22 hacks. This is because x22 hacks are always undetected. Should have seen all the people getting the CSS hack after ******** hack went detected. :lol:

Here is the link to the testimonial section:

http://shop.x22cheats.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6

[roofio69]

Well xRadar has been detected 3 times, what about ********?[U]

[Kenpo]

#roofio, those are possible detections son. Not a 100% detection.

[Blade]

The only time we have a detection is from someone leaking the hack. That is the only time we ever have detections, or that i have seen here. ;)

[Deadfreak]

Let's get things clear. First of all, every cheat has a possibility of being detected, based on the methods that are used. If one method were to be detected, then those who would use that method would also be detected. Undetected cheats should be the last thing you should worry about, because making a cheat undetected would not be hard for experienced coders. Keeping a cheat undetected on the other hand is what you should be worrying about. Here x22 makes his cheats undetected by multiple anti-cheats and keeps them undetected for a long time. This does not mean the cheats will never get detected though, because eventually a cheat will be detected at least one time. So far the CSS cheat has only been detected 3-4 times, since its initial release. As for now, the cheat is fully undetected and has been throughout the last 5 or so months, and still continues to be undetected. (little problems occur once in a while, but this is natural and comes with the price of cheating.) hatethesystem, most cheats are undetected, but they don't stay that way for long. Now to answer your question, the cheat is undetected, and continues to stay undetected. This does not mean it is "undetectable". If you still don't believe it is undetected, then we won't argue on your opinion, just look at the testimonials, the customers have their own opinions as well. There are no test versions of the cheats, because this would cause a risk to the detection rate.

[roofio69]

#roofio, those are possible detections son. Not a 100% detection.

Ive been banned 3 times with xRadar/xInstanthook CS:S.

So no, your wrong.

[Kenpo]

Aight, if you say so, Dead gave the full info.

[Sanca`]

I think deadfreak wrote too much.

To put it simple, we have tons of other people from different cheating sites come here and stay here. I think that speaks for itself.

[fus1on]

I've never experienced any problems with x22cheats.com - if there is a 'possible' detection, the hack is disabled for a very short time to make sure the users are still safe. There have been many times were an anti-cheat has updated and the hack was still undetected after that. I used a CoD4 hack for several months without getting detected, there were PunkBuster updates in those months and the hack was still fine. One day, there was a 'possible' detection, so the hack was disabled so all the users of the hack were safe, the hack was then updated and was even safer than before.

[skywatch]

I don't worry about VAC2, only about Aequitas.

I really have to think about buying it...it's still quite a risk!

[Kenpo]

There's always a risk when hacking, x22 keeps everything top notch. It's up to you. ;)

[|>Torze<|]

There's always a risk when hacking, x22 keeps everything top notch. It's up to you. ;)

Cheating, Kenpo, not hacking. x22 is the hacker here.

If you don't want to risk getting bant - don't cheat. Simple as that.